Anonymous girl sitting an exam

Picture copyright
PA

Picture caption

The proportion of pupils receiving additional time for exams was larger in unbiased colleges than state colleges final yr

One in 5 college students in unbiased colleges acquired additional time to finish GCSE and A-level exams final yr.

The proportion was considerably larger than those that acquired the particular measure in state colleges the place the determine is fewer than one in eight.

The distinction has come to mild following an evaluation of official examination knowledge by BBC Radio four’s Today programme.

Exams watchdog Ofqual stated this can be due to the readiness of colleges to search out college students entitled to extra time.

HMC, a bunch representing unbiased colleges, stated the upper fee was all the way down to “correct resourcing” which it stated “will be be missing in state maintained colleges”.

However the head instructor of a complete faculty in Suffolk stated the completely different charges raised “severe questions”.

College students obtain additional time, sometimes greater than three hours to finish a two-and-a-half hour examination, due to particular wants or disabilities like dyslexia.

The system has beforehand confronted claims that higher resourced colleges could also be extra prone to obtain the measure, which is out there as a part of guidelines to make sure a stage enjoying discipline for examination candidates.

Picture caption

The variety of college students awarded additional time in England, Wales and Northern Eire has elevated yearly since 2011

Final yr in GCSE and A-level exams, additional time was awarded to greater than 27,000 unbiased faculty college students – which represented almost 20% of all candidates within the sector.

In state establishments, round 200,000 college students acquired additional time, which represented lower than 12% of all state sector college students taking the exams.

The whole variety of college students awarded additional time in England, Wales and Northern Eire has elevated yearly since 2011.

Ofqual has beforehand launched measures to attempt to scale back requests for so-called Entry Preparations after claims the system was being abused.

The Joint Council for (JCQ) which represents the UK’s largest examination boards, stated it was vital the preparations have been accredited solely for many who wanted them.

In an announcement, it stated: “There is a rigorous course of to make sure this, together with annual inspections, and we evaluation this course of yearly.

“Equity is ensured by the method being the identical, no matter location or sort of faculty or school.”

Geoff Barton, head instructor of King Edward VI complete faculty in Bury St Edmunds, blamed a “excessive stakes” accountability system together with outcomes and league tables for influencing colleges’ use of the measure.

He stated: “Whether or not they’re getting particular consideration does appear to be one thing that is not solely finished within the pursuits of the teenager, but in addition can have an impact for the college.

“So there is no shock that colleges will replicate on that as they’re planning the examination season.”

He added: “What the info does is to boost some severe questions for colleges.”

Peter Hamilton, HMC’s educational coverage spokesman and headmaster of Harberdashers’ Aske’s Boys’ Faculty in Borehamwood, stated the unbiased sector was capable of apply for assist for pupils “due to ever-improving monitoring and consciousness of particular wants”.

He stated: “We’re additionally lucky to have correct resourcing and specialist departments, which will be missing in state maintained colleges.

“All heads wish to see studying assist employees given the money and time obligatory to make sure all pupils are capable of declare their rights.”

Picture copyright
Thinkstock

Picture caption

The Joint Council for says there’s a rigorous course of to make sure preparations have been accredited solely for many who wanted them

The watchdog stated the info did point out some variation between forms of examination centres.

It stated the distinction might be partly defined “by the flexibility and readiness of centres to establish college students who’re entitled to an affordable adjustment”.

Each state and personal sectors concerned within the knowledge comparability embody particular colleges, whose college students usually tend to require entry preparations.

Ofqual stated the personal sector figures included unbiased particular colleges which can influence upon the odds when making comparisons.

An unbiased particular colleges supply stated the numbers of scholars concerned in such exams was comparatively low. It is thought unlikely to have a big influence on the comparability between sectors.

A charity that helps folks with dyslexia has beforehand stated colleges wanted higher coaching to get pupils assessed, including that college students didn’t want formal or expensive diagnoses to qualify for entry preparations.

The Right this moment programme first used freedom of data legal guidelines in 2014 to ask JCQ for figures on access arrangements in varied forms of colleges.

Following a ruling by the Info Commissioner, it emerged that the info could be provided by examination boards to Ofqual.